Appearing for Sisodia, Senior Advocate Dayan Krishnan countered,
“Their grounds for remand are not tenable in law at all. All the arguments about profit margin was approved by the LG. The LG, who is the complainant in the case, approved it in May 2021.”
On the allegation that Sisodia destroyed three of his four phones, Krishnan said,
“They say Sisodia used four phones, three of which are destroyed? What am I supposed to do? Keep those phones in anticipation that agency will come and arrest me?”
He went on to argue,
“Their case is I did not answer in the way they wanted me to answer. I will show why that is not a ground for remand. If your lordships grant remand for self-incrimination then that would be a travesty.”
Source: Barandbench
