The issue of pendency not only prolongs the suffering of the litigants, but also undermines the very essence of the judiciary system. The principle of “justice delayed is justice denied” rings true in these cases, as delays lead to loss of crucial evidence, fading memories, and the erosion of public trust in the judiciary.
There have been numerous discussions and debates on improving the judicial system. Meanwhile, pendency has now increased to around 5 crore cases. Hence, simply reiterating the same rhetoric does not effectively address the issue at hand.
The case of Balram Kashyap v. Bhagirathi Ganju serves as a stark reminder of the need to prioritize judicial reform. It is imperative to address the systemic issues that contribute to pendency, such as inadequate infrastructure, shortage of judges, inefficient case management and outdated procedural laws. Furthermore, transparency and accountability must be improved within the judiciary, and the implementation of technology can play a pivotal role in expediting case processing.
It remains to be seen when this case will actually find closure, providing long-awaited justice to the litigants involved. As the nation watches, this case serves as a vital reminder of the pressing need for judicial reform and the importance of delivering timely justice for all.
Source: Barandbench
