A Division Bench of Justices GS Patel and Neela Gokhale declared that it was unacceptable that applicants were finalising their itineraries even before approaching courts.
They were implicitly assuming that their matters will be heard on priority to permit them to keep up to their itinerary.
“This is not a question of whether or not there is a right that is violated. In all these applications, it seems that courts are more or less being taken for granted, that permissions will follow…and, more importantly, that applications will be taken up on a priority basis and even out of turn to permit the applicants to keep to their itineraries. This is not acceptable,” the Bench stressed.
Source: Barandbench
