In his appeals, Sharma said that criminal and defamation proceedings should be initiated against the single-judge because by dismissing his petitions, the judge has violated his fundamental rights.
He contended that her judgment was not only ‘baseless’ but also ‘defamatory,’ and therefore, the judge should be charged with criminal defamation.
“Criminally charge the Single Bench for a meaningless, defamatory, criminal, seditious judgment on such an important issue under IPC 124A, 166A(b), 167, 192, 193, 217, 405, 409, 499, 500, and Section 16 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (70 of 1971), and give her death penalty considering that such blatant trampling of fundamental rights in Constitution of India by a High Court Judge in performing her duty if not punished in the strictest sense could be understood by other Judges to destroy with impunity the Judicial system of this country from within,” he prayed.
Source: Barandbench
