Senior Advocate Shashank Shekhar, appearing for the petitioner, argued that based on the FIR and other material, it was obvious that the complaint was lodged only to defame the petitioner.
He underlined that the FIR did not say that the alleged act was non-consensual or that the complainant ever opposed it. Further, he argued that the complainant staying with the petitioner for three years and not complaining during that period, made it apparent that he was a consenting party.
Source: Barandbench
