Irani refuted the allegations, and pointed out that she had argued the appeal before a division bench of the High Court in February 2010 for over an hour. The Bench had then asked that the complainant’s children be produced in court, so that they could be interviewed. He supposedly refused to comply with the order, after which the bench treated the hearing as null and void and did not pass any order.
Irani also claimed that the complainant constantly hounded her with emails and calls. Simultaneously, due to some technical reasons, her name did not reflect on record of the appeal, which was dismissed. But Irani eventually got it restored.
Irani pointed out that due to non-payment of her fees, and tired of the general misconduct of the client through his communication, she decided to discontinue her services to him.
Source: Barandbench
