The Court also rejected the contention of wife that specific dates and times of instances of cruelty were not mentioned in the plea decided by family court.
“In the facts and circumstances of the case, would lose its significance for the reason that the respondent-husband has in his evidence specifically stated that whenever a quarrel would take place the appellant-wife would use those words against him and his family, which implies that the said words have been used -repeatedly over the period when they were together,” the order stated.
Accordingly, the Court was of the view that there was no infirmity in the the family court’s findings, and thus dismissed the appeal.
Source: Barandbench
