The petitioners argue that they received information from reliable sources that the appointment of the officers was made on the recommendation of RSS.
“That petitioners got information from reliable sources that appointment list of State Law Officers was made on the recommendation of Rashtriya Swayam Sevak Sangh and several Advocates who hold different position in the Sangh have been appointed.”
The plea also contends that out of the total 220 selected officers, some have not even completed five years of practice. It further stated,
“That in the list of 220 members some Advocates are relatives of dominant politicians in State and some are relatives of the Judicial officers and few are juniors or followers of Additional Advocate Generals in High Court Lucknow or High Court Allahabad.”
Source: Barandbench
