The Court was dealing with an appeal filed by an architect challenging a family court order dated April 15, directing him to pay ₹75,000 as monthly maintenance to his wife.
The couple had married in 2018 and had a 5-year-old girl child.
The Court was told that the wife was a post-graduate but was currently unemployed and living with her parents. She had sought ₹2,00,000 as monthly maintenance from her husband, but a family court eventually ordered for the payment of ₹75,000 as maintenance.
While challenging this order before the High Court, the husband alleged that his wife was living in adultery and sought to show certain photographs to support his claim.
Source: Barandbench
