Even the driest months in low-lying, coastal Auckland see a lot of rainfall. That’s three flood risk factors right there.
But the New Zealand city also has a lot of natural attributes that help excess water drain away quickly, making it more resilient to flooding and other hydrological events than many other urban centres.
And this “sponginess”, or ability to draw water away from the surface, needs to be a key consideration in urban planning, experts believe. Sponge cities will have a greater capacity to deal with more extreme weather and rising sea levels caused by climate change.
So what is a sponge city?
Auckland is one of the world’s best sponge cities, according to research on eight of the world’s biggest urban centres by professional services firm Arup. Sponge cities work in tune with nature to quickly soak up heavy rainfall, rather than solely relying on grey infrastructure like pipes and pumps.
A city’s sponginess is affected by the balance between blue (ponds, lakes), green (grass, trees) and grey (buildings, hard surfaces) infrastructure. Soil types and vegetation, as well as the water runoff potential, also have a role to play.
Sandy soils are generally spongier than more clay-based soils, but the depth of the soil and the depth to the water table also have an impact. If the groundwater table is close to the surface, this reduces the sponge capacity of the soil.
Despite being New Zealand’s most populous urban area, Auckland is also rich in green space. Its houses often have decent-sized gardens, and there are a number of large parks.
Half of Auckland’s land is covered by green or blue. This was one of the highest percentages in Arup’s report, only marginally behind Nairobi in Kenya.
While Nairobi’s grasslands make it a comparatively green city, it has a higher runoff potential than the other cities analyzed, because of a high percentage of clay within the soil. This makes it a slightly less good sponge city.
Over half of Nairobi is covered in green or blue infrastructure, thanks to large amounts of grassland. Image: Arup Global Sponge Cities Snapshop
The least spongy city that Arup analyzed was Sydney in Australia, which has just 24% green or blue space, with many parks located outside of the city. The centre of the city is largely built-up and has impermeable concrete surfaces as a result. In addition, Sydney has a moderately high runoff potential, with a fairly clay-rich soil.
How can sponge cities prevent floods?
Sponge cities are able to soak up excess water and release it more slowly back into rivers and water systems.
Sponge cities are able to soak up excess water and release it more slowly back into rivers and water systems. Image: Arup Global Sponge Cities Snapshop
We need to measure and place more value on green and blue infrastructure – trees, grass and ponds – Arup argues, saying that we even need to design cities with sponginess in mind. Nature-based solutions to climate change are on average 50% more cost effective than engineered alternatives, and deliver 28% more added value than grey infrastructure.
Source: The Print
