CJI Chandrachud flagged the potential of bias and indirect discrimination manifested in the use of AI in this regard, giving the example of the increased use of biometrics, specifically facial recognition technology (FRT).
“The impact of bias in AI systems presents a complex challenge, particularly when it comes to indirect discrimination. This form of discrimination occurs when seemingly neutral policies or algorithms disproportionately affect certain groups, thereby undermining their rights and protections … Facial recognition technology (FRT) serves as a prime example of high-risk AI, given its inherently intrusive nature and potential for misuse,” he stated.
The CJI stressed that one cannot avoid the question of using AI in court adjudication.
At the same time, he cautioned that,
“The integration of AI in modern processes including court proceedings raises complex ethical, legal, and practical considerations that demand a thorough examination. The use of AI in court adjudication presents both opportunities and challenges that warrant nuanced deliberation.”
Source: Barandbench
