She further said that to take care of her son, spent nearly ₹2 crores.
The plaint then proceeded to list out the money spent by the plaintiff.
“That the plaintiff got the opposite party no.1 trained in the USA to fly for which a fee of ₹35 lakhs was paid by the plaintiff. Apart from this, cost of living in the USA of about ₹20 lakhs was borne by the applicant and for the happiness of opposite parties 1 and 2, the petitioner bought an Audi A6 car costing ₹65 lakhs on loan from PNB Bank for them to roam around,” the plea stated.
However, the couple was functioning as per the wishes of the daughter-in-law’s family members who had even taken control over their son’s salary, the suit alleged.
Source: Barandbench
