The judge elaborated that not providing reasoning in support of judicial orders was impermissible, but brief reasoning would suffice in order to meet ends of justice, and would render the remedy of appeal purposeful.
Despite these observations, since the Court agreed with the final conclusion, the order under challenge was left undisturbed.
However, a copy of this order was directed to be circulated amongst all judges of the district judiciary for future reference.
Source: Barandbench
