The Court further observed that the facilities did not meet the required standards and were simply “namesake” facilities.
“The photo, annexed to the report, least to say, shocks one’s conscience. There is nothing in the photo to show whether to toilet is for boys or girls. Secondly, the toilet block is in an entirely shabby condition, even the outer wall and the door seems to have recently painted. That too, just putting some coats of paint,” the bench observed.
Source: Barandbench
