The Court went on to reproduce the entire order being challenged and scrutinise it paragraph-by-paragraph before concluding that there was only a single sentence in the ten-page order which could be likened to any kind of reasoning.
“The Assistant Controller appears to be thoroughly confused both as to the nature of the claim for which the application was made as well as objections raised in the FER and in the notice of hearing… In fact, the impugned order reflects that parts – often incomplete – of various documents have been randomly cut and pasted together, leaving the reader of the order to divine, for himself, the reason why,” the High Court said.
Source: Barandbench
