The petitioner informed the Court that she was satisfied with the eviction being set aside. However, due to her strained relationship with her in-laws, she expressed her reluctance to share a house with them, particularly considering her 9-year-old son.
She did not dispute that that the property belonged to her in-laws. She also informed the Court that she was offered alternative homes but rejected them as they were shared houses as well.
Source: Barandbench
