In her appeal, the wife argued that the single-judge order had less to do with the prayer of the parties, and instead, went on to talk about how must the wife behave when her estranged husband was visiting their child.
She also informed the Court that while the single-judge had granted visitation rights to the man, she was now leaving Chennai and moving to Gurugram for a new job. The couple’s daughter, who has been living with the woman since they separated in 2017, had also been admitted to a new school in that city, the petitioner woman said.
The husband, however, argued that the woman’s grievance was with certain observations made by the single-judge. Therefore, while those could be expunged, there must not be any interference in the visitation rights granted to him.
Source: Barandbench
