![](https://i0.wp.com/gumlet.assettype.com/barandbench%2F2022-12%2F2542b3d8-b47f-4b5f-b1fd-4acd648e6b6a%2FBOMBAY__WEB_PAGE_1600x900rq.jpg?w=696&ssl=1)
The petitioner contended that the following remarks by the High Court against him were objectionable:
– attributing deep rooted bias (on the part of the petitioner-judge) in favour of the prosecution;
– acting in a sheerly partisan bent of mind that by any means, the accused/ appellant Ahshringdaw Warisa had to be convicted;
– virtually predetermined conclusion;
– committing an act of rank judicial impropriety;
– acting in an absolutely slipshod manner;
– acting as a mute spectator without giving a second thought and by total non-application of mind to the actual evidence available on record.
Source: Barandbench